1.
The Mvita Constituency Development
Fund Committee
At
the inauguration of the CDF Act in 2003, the initial team of Committees
appointed within each constituency had to think hard about the future of the
community, regions and country as a whole that they represented. The decision to manage approximately Kshs. 50 million/year was
a profound decision that needed to be based on diligent service to the
people. In the five years from
2003-2007 as a member of the Mvita Constituency Development Committee, I was
involved in various development initiatives and several conversations about the
need to establish development initiatives for the posterity of the
constituency.
As
a part of this team it was important to emphasize the fact that our community’s
wealth lies in the discipline and vision of its community and leadership. As a
part of this team we needed to play a committed role in seeking out the
opportunities and the solutions to the situations the constituency faced and to
navigate and defend our resources in the interest of a better life. After
almost 20 years of poor leadership that had seen the rate of drug abuse, HIV
increase within the community this team needed to entrench a leadership that
ensured perpetual regeneration and refinement to suit the social, economic and
technological changes in today’s world. It was important that this leadership
would ensure that the community’s hard-earned freedom rewarded them with
abundant wealth and not punished them with chronic poverty.
As
a part of this team we were able to initiate the Tunajibu kwa Maisha Bora
Campaign that committed to unshackle the communities mind and heart from
tribal, religious and ethnic affiliations that would enhance their prosperity
in diversity
Within
the CDF, we had 40 Project Committees each with a membership of 20 members. As
Secretary of the CDF, I managed the US $ 2 million (Kshs.124 million)
Development Fund, with a portfolio of 67 community projects. For 2 years in a
row our committee ranked Number 2 out of 210 constituencies countrywide. This
independent survey and ranking was carried out by the National Tax Payers
Association and The Ministry of Planning.
The
CDF Act requires that every committee set up under the Act must have an NGO
within it. I was the Executive Trustee of the Mvita CDF. Under the ambit of my
authority, I pursued a number of funding proposals for the community. This
included raising US $ 200,000 from the Ford Foundation towards establishing an
information education and communication strategy for young people in
Mombasa and leadership in education in the Coast Province. I also managed
a UNEP and Bamburi Cement Ltd funded waste water and drainage project within
Mombasa City. The project cost $ 50,000 and was completed satisfactorily. The projects
are still running.
.
2. The
Mariakani Town Council
At
the heart and soul of our towns and cities in Kenya, is the provision of basic
needs by public sector institutions in response to basic human rights of our
culturally diverse community of residents.
As
the youngest appointed Councilor at the age of 26, I was part of the Mariakani
Town Council with specific responsibility from the Minister of Local Government
to ensure effective operation of the Town Council. I joined this team in a year
when the Ministry of Local Government needed to streamline the number of local
authorities in the country. As part of this team I was able to get the team to
identify with the economic potential of the local area and ensure that its
management provided an opportunity for the community’s economic prosperity.
In
the implementation of my duties I was able to chair the first probe committee
looking into the restructuring of financial management, human resource
structures and systems of the Mariakani Local Authority. As part of this team I
was able to work in liaison with Ministers, Permanent Secretary’s at the
national level and chiefs and village elders at the rural level. Part of the
plan currently informs the existing development plan of the Town Council.
3.
The National Union of Students (NUS)
Presidents Network
Every
year over 300 further and higher education institutions in the United Kingdom
receive revenue from three main sources – government grants, research grants
and international students. It is estimated that approximately 500,000 students
from countries all over the world are admitted to these institutions of higher
learning. It is further estimated that annually this contribution amounts to
approximately £ 8.8 billion. (Approximately the same amount of money that the
British Government spends on foreign aid annually!)
As
one of the first African students to be elected as Student Union President and
having the honor to participate in the NUS network of Student Union Presidents,
I was part of a team that participated in the Tuition Fees debate and campaign
in 1999/2000. In the previous years that this debate had taken place, the voice
of foreign students was unrepresented. My participation in this team was able
to lend new insights into the challenges that foreign students faced despite
their 30% representation within the various universities.
My
opportunity to work within this team enabled me to engage with senior members
of the major political parties, the Prime Minister’s Office, the Commonwealth
Office, foreign embassies, the Exchequer and the department of education among
other senior university officials. This opportunity enabled me to identify with
and get to network with this diverse group of stakeholders. This relationship
enabled me to relate to the situations that international students were going
through and get them to think about including some of these concerns into the
drafting of any tuition fee policy. In the drafting of this policy, as a team
we were able to ensure that foreign students were offered the opportunity to
apply for at least 1 year stay to remain in the U.K, should they qualify for
any employment opportunity after graduation. This opportunity allowed foreign
students especially from developing countries to gain opportunities to horn
their skills prior to returning home. This we considered a fair return on
investment on the part of the U.K Government.
No comments:
Post a Comment